PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
33.96%
Revenue growth of 33.96% vs. zero growth in Solar. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-13.81%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
3.34%
EBIT growth of 3.34% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
3.34%
Operating income growth of 3.34% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
60.74%
Net income growth of 60.74% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
34.50%
EPS growth of 34.50% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
34.50%
Diluted EPS growth of 34.50% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-16.12%
Share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-16.12%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.51%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-188.03%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1468.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 160.65%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
1468.44%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 68.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
1468.44%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 110.25%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
84.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 84.42% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
84.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 84.42% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
84.42%
3Y OCF/share growth of 84.42% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
80.68%
Net income/share CAGR of 80.68% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
80.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
80.68%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.45%
AR growth of 42.45% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
26.21%
Inventory growth of 26.21% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
92.75%
Asset growth of 92.75% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
250.95%
BV/share growth of 250.95% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.76%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-183.30%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.