PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
43.00%
Revenue growth of 43.00% vs. zero growth in Solar. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
23.23%
Gross profit growth of 23.23% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
49.67%
EBIT growth of 49.67% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
49.67%
Operating income growth of 49.67% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
139.84%
Net income growth of 139.84% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
110.69%
EPS growth of 110.69% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
109.67%
Diluted EPS growth of 109.67% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
162.28%
Share change of 162.28% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
187.19%
Diluted share change of 187.19% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7700.00%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-13.87%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-78.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 116.05%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-78.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-78.34%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 65.65%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
97.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 97.87% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
97.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 97.87% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
97.87%
3Y OCF/share growth of 97.87% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
100.20%
Net income/share CAGR of 100.20% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
100.20%
Net income/share CAGR of 100.20% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
100.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 100.20% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.40%
AR growth of 25.40% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
31.67%
Inventory growth of 31.67% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
4.21%
Asset growth of 4.21% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-61.69%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
234.90%
R&D growth of 234.90% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
329.37%
SG&A growth of 329.37% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.