PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
91.05%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 24.55%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
78.70%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 17.28%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-24.88%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-125.93%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-89.04%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -15.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-87.50%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is -1.08%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-87.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is -1.08%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
11.95%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 28.48%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
14.76%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.06%
OCF growth of 77.06% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
23.51%
FCF growth of 23.51% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-39.08%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 236.71%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-39.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 158.70%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-39.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 153.96%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
97.40%
OCF/share CAGR of 97.40% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
97.40%
OCF/share CAGR of 97.40% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
97.40%
3Y OCF/share growth of 97.40% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
100.81%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 10.10% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
100.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 57.57%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
100.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 57.57%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.42%
AR growth of 102.42% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
221.47%
Inventory growth of 221.47% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
86.59%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
16.25%
Positive BV/share change while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.51%
R&D growth of 14.51% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
266.44%
SG&A growth of 266.44% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.