PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.86%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Solar median of 58.54%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
28.91%
Gross profit growth below 50% of Solar median of 74.29%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental margin deterioration.
151.45%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 31.42%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
151.45%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 31.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
257.74%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.64%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
254.71%
EPS growth of 254.71% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
240.65%
Diluted EPS growth of 240.65% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
3.42%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
9.97%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-371.63%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-70.65%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.51%
Receivables growth far exceeding Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
-0.82%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
38.41%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 19.88%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
25.38%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
112.50%
Debt growth of 112.50% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
38.32%
R&D growth far exceeding Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects a potential “throw money at problems” approach or a race for new tech that might not pay off.
6.12%
SG&A dropping significantly vs. Solar median. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term margin upside but checks for underinvestment risk.