PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
22.00%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 11.00%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
13.01%
Gross profit growth of 13.01% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
74.46%
EBIT growth of 74.46% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
32.20%
Operating income growth of 32.20% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
146.08%
Net income growth of 146.08% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
162.24%
EPS growth of 162.24% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
144.76%
Diluted EPS growth of 144.76% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
4.71%
Share change of 4.71% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
3.00%
Diluted share change of 3.00% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-431.41%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is -17.08%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-1092.57%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is -13.87%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
9.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Solar median of 166.18%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
9.37%
Below 50% of Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
9.37%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Solar median of 60.11%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
82.72%
OCF/share CAGR of 82.72% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
82.72%
OCF/share CAGR of 82.72% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
82.72%
3Y OCF/share growth of 82.72% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
107.35%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Solar median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
107.35%
5Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Solar median. Guy Spier might question fundamental disadvantages in cost structure or growth drivers.
107.35%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Solar median. Guy Spier might worry about a partial underperformance vs. competitor norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.66%
AR growth of 33.66% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
33.95%
Inventory growth of 33.95% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.31%
Below 50% of Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects stagnation or limited capital availability for expansions.
-0.35%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
339.16%
R&D growth of 339.16% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.58%
SG&A growth of 5.58% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.