PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.22%
Revenue growth of 39.22% vs. zero growth in Solar. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
64.11%
Gross profit growth of 64.11% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
165.49%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 20.19%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
49.95%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 21.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
245.39%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 9.71%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
325.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
316.67%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
8.51%
Share change of 8.51% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
17.51%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.32%
OCF growth of 105.32% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
53.59%
FCF growth of 53.59% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
251.78%
10Y CAGR of 251.78% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
251.78%
5Y CAGR of 251.78% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
283.50%
3Y CAGR of 283.50% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-97.12%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-97.12%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-56.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
143.82%
Net income/share CAGR of 143.82% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
143.82%
Net income/share CAGR of 143.82% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
87.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 87.49% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 99.40% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.93%
AR growth of 96.93% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-23.39%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
16.24%
Asset growth of 16.24% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
7.98%
BV/share growth of 7.98% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
43.10%
Debt growth of 43.10% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-13.03%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
0.79%
SG&A dropping significantly vs. Solar median. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term margin upside but checks for underinvestment risk.