PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
56.67%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 33.97%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
56.16%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 11.46%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
197.71%
EBIT growth of 197.71% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
482.57%
Operating income growth of 482.57% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
36.18%
Net income growth of 36.18% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
-48.15%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 4.99%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-50.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 4.99%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
4.18%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-2.13%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.26%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2691.15%
OCF growth of 2691.15% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
166.65%
FCF growth of 166.65% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
419.70%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 6.02%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
764.13%
3Y OCF/share growth of 764.13% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Solar median. John Neff would seek cost or revenue improvements to match peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
106.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 106.84% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.20%
AR growth of 6.20% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-9.01%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
6.77%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 1.55%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-0.99%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
7.58%
Debt growth of 7.58% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
20.39%
R&D growth far exceeding Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects a potential “throw money at problems” approach or a race for new tech that might not pay off.
6.07%
SG&A growth of 6.07% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.