PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.21%
Revenue growth of 17.21% vs. zero growth in Solar. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-72.55%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-60.26%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-42.37%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-95.09%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-114.57%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-115.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.25%
Share change of 0.25% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.58%
OCF growth of 17.58% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
130.50%
FCF growth of 130.50% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
7074.36%
10Y CAGR of 7074.36% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
7074.36%
5Y CAGR of 7074.36% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
409.05%
3Y CAGR of 409.05% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
4274.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 4274.13% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
4274.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 4274.13% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
251.21%
3Y OCF/share growth of 251.21% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
107.09%
Net income/share CAGR of 107.09% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
107.09%
Net income/share CAGR of 107.09% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-94.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 95.42% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-15.43%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.05%
Asset growth of 3.05% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.36%
BV/share growth of 1.36% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
9.12%
Debt growth of 9.12% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
3.94%
R&D growth of 3.94% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
35.79%
SG&A growth of 35.79% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.