PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.64%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.50%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-69.23%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 25.84%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
578.63%
EBIT growth of 578.63% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
41.20%
Operating income growth of 41.20% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-149.44%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-150.00%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-150.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.43%
Share change of 0.43% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.94%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-459.13%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 27.31%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-402.94%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
331.84%
10Y CAGR of 331.84% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
331.84%
5Y CAGR of 331.84% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
73.83%
3Y CAGR of 73.83% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-165.78%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-165.78%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-1141.78%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
81.92%
Net income/share CAGR of 81.92% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
81.92%
Net income/share CAGR of 81.92% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
8.58%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 8.58% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.44%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 77.44% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.89%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
5.78%
Inventory growth of 5.78% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
4.06%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.55%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
2.53%
BV/share growth of 2.53% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-12.08%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
7.68%
R&D growth of 7.68% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
25.74%
SG&A growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.