PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
43.31%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 35.73%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
28.15%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Solar median of 39.40%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
-38.47%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 10.05%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
573.02%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 10.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
423.62%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 11.21%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
423.08%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 11.23%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
423.08%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 10.87%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.29%
Share change of 0.29% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
10.55%
Diluted share change of 10.55% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.45%
Positive OCF growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
73.33%
FCF growth of 73.33% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
628.87%
5Y CAGR of 628.87% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
90.49%
3Y CAGR of 90.49% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.34%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-68.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
457.79%
Net income/share CAGR of 457.79% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
93.42%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 93.42% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
371.33%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 371.33% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
37.60%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 37.60% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.97%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
7.14%
Inventory growth of 7.14% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-15.11%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.77%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-41.06%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
19.42%
R&D growth of 19.42% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.90%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.