PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-51.83%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -7.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-62.76%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is -12.49%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-105.83%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is -23.28%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-100.96%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is -21.89%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-101.39%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -29.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-101.54%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is -28.77%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-101.54%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is -29.20%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.83%
Share change of 0.83% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-8.75%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-171.46%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is -46.73%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-195.44%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is -46.73%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
47.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Solar median of 117.51%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
581.83%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 176.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
35.03%
3Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Solar median of 68.79%. Guy Spier might worry about a waning short-term advantage.
64.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.39% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-1569.50%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-106.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
98.94%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Solar median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
-627.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 87.98%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-114.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
296.72%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 296.72% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
47.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 47.74% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.42%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
55.54%
Inventory growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
2.52%
Asset growth near Solar median. Charlie Munger attributes it to a typical industry cycle of capital investment.
-2.64%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 1.23%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
1.76%
Debt growth of 1.76% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-3.19%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-41.70%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.