PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.59%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.12%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
62.44%
Gross profit growth of 62.44% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-8.26%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
0.07%
Operating income growth of 0.07% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-12.95%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-5.97%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 0.59%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-5.97%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 0.59%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
5.99%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
5.99%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
67.36%
OCF growth of 67.36% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
56.05%
FCF growth of 56.05% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
440.15%
10Y CAGR of 440.15% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
117.43%
5Y CAGR of 117.43% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
53.55%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 7.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-134.86%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-652.07%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-1310.38%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-97.51%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-898.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-550.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 13.52% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-32.09%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.25%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-12.78%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.89%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-12.10%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is -0.53%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
20.41%
Debt growth of 20.41% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-15.68%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-18.00%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.