PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.56%
Revenue growth of 4.56% vs. zero growth in Solar. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-41.96%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-413.65%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-51.69%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-198.26%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-197.56%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-197.56%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.16%
Share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.16%
Diluted share change of 0.16% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
545.05%
OCF growth of 545.05% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
236.46%
FCF growth of 236.46% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
7017.95%
10Y CAGR of 7017.95% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
92.06%
5Y CAGR of 92.06% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-0.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
5178.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 5178.66% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
328.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 328.42% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
21.67%
3Y OCF/share growth of 21.67% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-757.62%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-1985.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-12189.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.00%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-42.32%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.42%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-28.44%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
4.63%
We expand assets while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
-11.19%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is -0.70%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
4.61%
Debt growth of 4.61% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
18.15%
R&D growth of 18.15% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
46.11%
SG&A growth of 46.11% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.