PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.35%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -11.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
26.53%
Positive gross profit growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
72.87%
EBIT growth of 72.87% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
78.67%
Operating income growth of 78.67% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
62.22%
Net income growth of 62.22% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
62.30%
EPS growth of 62.30% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
62.30%
Diluted EPS growth of 62.30% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.12%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.34%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.17%
Positive OCF growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
72.30%
Positive FCF growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
68.63%
10Y CAGR of 68.63% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
54.18%
5Y CAGR of 54.18% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
46.43%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
127.60%
OCF/share CAGR of 127.60% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
259.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 259.76% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
606.49%
3Y OCF/share growth of 606.49% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
77.75%
Net income/share CAGR of 77.75% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-402.72%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-448.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -47.77%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.93%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-47.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.59%
Slight AR growth while Solar cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
-3.44%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-5.33%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-5.21%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is -1.86%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-12.86%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-25.47%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-31.19%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.