PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.27%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is 10.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
81.85%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 14.19%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
203.22%
EBIT growth of 203.22% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
233.05%
Operating income growth of 233.05% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
135.77%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
134.78%
EPS growth of 134.78% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
132.61%
Diluted EPS growth of 132.61% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
1.71%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
12.03%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-139.66%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-186.10%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
411.97%
10Y CAGR of 411.97% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-1.10%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
18.56%
3Y CAGR of 18.56% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-150.68%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-244.90%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
22.96%
3Y OCF/share growth of 22.96% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
144.97%
Net income/share CAGR of 144.97% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-58.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -31.03%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
348.70%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.99%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-48.30%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.40%
AR growth of 36.40% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-16.42%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
16.15%
Asset growth of 16.15% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.18%
Positive BV/share change while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
32.39%
Slightly rising debt while Solar median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
-1.03%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-11.49%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.