PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.65%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is 12.95%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-42.24%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 10.42%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-90.10%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-90.68%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-78.32%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-79.25%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-78.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
6.18%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-2.56%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.29%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-361.62%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-675.31%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
320.41%
10Y CAGR of 320.41% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
19.51%
5Y CAGR of 19.51% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-35.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -6.05%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-194.25%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-3372.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
6.13%
3Y OCF/share growth of 6.13% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
130.22%
Net income/share CAGR of 130.22% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-31.05%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
107.18%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 107.18% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.04%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-31.98%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.34%
AR growth of 74.34% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-1.99%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
12.95%
Asset growth of 12.95% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
8.74%
BV/share growth of 8.74% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
19.49%
Debt growth of 19.49% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-0.99%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-3.29%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.