PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-62.13%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -12.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-65.00%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is -9.05%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-108.93%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 1.88%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-106.87%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-107.11%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -49.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-107.05%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is -79.19%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-108.75%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is -74.25%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.49%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-19.53%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-192.69%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-481.43%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
5.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Solar median of 63.40%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-8.51%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -10.87%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-24.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -18.23%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
83.11%
OCF/share CAGR of 83.11% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-532.42%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
29.72%
Positive short-term OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch would note a strong competitive advantage in near-term cash generation.
96.49%
Net income/share CAGR of 96.49% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-154.92%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 15.84%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
89.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Solar median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm expansions or margin boosts drive the short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.23%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
1.53%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 1.53% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-11.26%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
45.07%
Inventory growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-5.58%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.43%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is -0.42%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-13.00%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-6.85%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
3.64%
SG&A growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.