PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.81%
Positive revenue growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
153.84%
Positive gross profit growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
29.81%
EBIT growth of 29.81% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
33.02%
Positive operating income growth while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
33.08%
Positive net income growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
34.04%
Positive EPS growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
1.01%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.40%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.60%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-3.56%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is -12.33%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
308.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 192.87%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-40.06%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 22.69%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-47.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 25.28%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-2385.62%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-48.88%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 77.72%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-292.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-15021.96%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 83.91%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-2730.84%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 77.26%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-35.33%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 100.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
132.63%
Equity/share CAGR of 132.63% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-41.36%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
25.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Solar median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.74%
AR growth of 1.74% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
1.15%
Inventory reduction well below Solar median. Joel Greenblatt might see a sign of superior operational or supply-chain efficiency.
-0.46%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.33%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is -0.12%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
3.89%
Debt growth far outpacing Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects over-leveraging or deteriorating financial discipline.
1.06%
R&D growth of 1.06% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-7.43%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.