PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-67.89%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -8.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-214.64%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is -0.89%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
25.24%
EBIT growth of 25.24% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
51.95%
Positive operating income growth while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
51.12%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 8.73%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
51.26%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 10.71%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
51.26%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 7.41%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.33%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.33%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.11%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-145.35%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 10.28%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
22.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Solar median of 94.30%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-46.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -9.48%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-58.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -8.38%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-589.71%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 90.40%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
25.26%
Below 50% of Solar median. Jim Chanos would question the firm’s ability to convert sales into real cash in the mid-term.
-321.17%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 12.93%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-5856.79%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 26.18%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-45.21%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 94.91%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-281.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -33.33%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-30.93%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-46.59%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-36.42%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.67%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
6.59%
Inventory growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-5.27%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-13.05%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
21.24%
Debt growth far outpacing Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects over-leveraging or deteriorating financial discipline.
-14.02%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
1.33%
Our SG&A slightly up while Solar is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.