PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.34%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is 8.49%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
105.72%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 28.63%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
57.70%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 18.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
46.08%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 34.03%. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm if scale economies are a factor.
30.28%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 15.51%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
30.93%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 24.90%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if the company’s capital allocation strategy boosts these results.
30.93%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 24.90%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the gap to effective capital allocation.
0.39%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.39%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.51%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-15.58%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1.68%
10Y CAGR of 1.68% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-53.23%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-39.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 5.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-1801.75%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-208.25%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-14.01%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-845.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
5.36%
Below 50% of Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
-718.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 35.41%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-38.05%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-45.43%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-48.50%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.87%
Receivables growth far exceeding Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
3.93%
Inventory growth of 3.93% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.70%
Asset growth 50-75% of Solar median. Guy Spier sees potential underinvestment or overcaution vs. peers.
-5.90%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.54%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-9.60%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-3.71%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
1.93%
SG&A growth of 1.93% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.