PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.13%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 15.36%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
268.96%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 21.51%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
22.43%
EBIT growth 50-75% of Solar median of 32.86%. Guy Spier would be cautious about subpar efficiency or limited pricing power.
7.68%
Operating income growth below 50% of Solar median of 29.03%. Jim Chanos would suspect structural cost disadvantages.
42.14%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 10.59%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
41.79%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 22.22%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
41.79%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 22.00%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.05%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a meaningful advantage if shares are undervalued.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.55%
OCF growth of 83.55% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
54.77%
FCF growth of 54.77% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
15.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Solar median of 24.47%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
-36.17%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -2.32%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-31.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 17.28%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-6.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 98.94%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
28.49%
Below 50% of Solar median. Jim Chanos would question the firm’s ability to convert sales into real cash in the mid-term.
22.80%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Solar median of 9.60%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
-458.30%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 13.80%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
4.71%
Below 50% of Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
-259.26%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 30.76%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-53.50%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-46.51%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 32.78%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-52.35%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.82%
Receivables growth far exceeding Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
-8.26%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.10%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.89%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 4.08%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
18.11%
Debt growth of 18.11% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
4.75%
R&D growth of 4.75% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.44%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.