PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.77%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -19.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-392.47%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is -1.38%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
44.06%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 16.51%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
-116.79%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
43.28%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 8.32%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
43.75%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
43.75%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 4.01%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.41%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.41%
Diluted share change of 0.41% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-466.37%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-118.25%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-3.74%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-56.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -2.42%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-12.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-65.78%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-354.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 4.79%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
60.99%
3Y OCF/share growth of 60.99% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-438.19%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-218.94%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 15.62%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-1.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -10.83%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-115.11%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-121.56%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-120.43%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.00%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
8.52%
Inventory growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-1.91%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-47.14%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is -0.05%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
7.93%
Debt growth far outpacing Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects over-leveraging or deteriorating financial discipline.
-3.72%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
16.75%
SG&A growth of 16.75% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.