PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.29%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 9.96%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
153.10%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 19.59%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
260.81%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 36.61%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
156.30%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 39.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
235.37%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 46.75%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
234.92%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 39.70%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
219.05%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 39.70%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.53%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
17.72%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.61%
Positive OCF growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
40.80%
FCF growth of 40.80% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-6.51%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-21.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
0.57%
3Y CAGR of 0.57% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-1929.57%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
44.09%
OCF/share CAGR of 44.09% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
73.82%
3Y OCF/share growth of 73.82% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
440.85%
Net income/share CAGR of 440.85% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
684.37%
Net income/share CAGR of 684.37% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
268.19%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 268.19% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-107.70%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-110.70%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-111.80%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.68%
Receivables growth far exceeding Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
4.84%
Inventory growth of 4.84% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-15.98%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
56.59%
BV/share growth of 56.59% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
6.34%
Debt growth of 6.34% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
21.12%
R&D growth of 21.12% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-1.40%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.