PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.09%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 6.24%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
143.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 17.84%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-80.46%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 23.23%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-129.88%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 23.23%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-112.36%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 37.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-112.94%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 38.91%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-114.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 38.91%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.06%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
-14.56%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.81%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.50%
OCF growth of 55.50% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
28.19%
FCF growth of 28.19% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-32.22%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-33.90%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-36.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-130.37%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-2.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
72.75%
3Y OCF/share growth of 72.75% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-151.13%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-143.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 62.85%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
64.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Solar median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm expansions or margin boosts drive the short-term advantage.
-108.18%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-111.06%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-112.67%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.41%
AR growth of 9.41% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
10.82%
Inventory growth of 10.82% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-2.54%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-65.72%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-2.89%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-11.33%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
4.45%
SG&A growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.