PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.85%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.20%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
97.18%
Gross profit growth of 97.18% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
13.62%
Positive EBIT growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
104.53%
Operating income growth of 104.53% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
136.23%
Net income growth of 136.23% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
136.36%
EPS growth of 136.36% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
127.27%
Diluted EPS growth of 127.27% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
6.93%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
9.44%
Diluted share change of 9.44% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.62%
OCF growth of 93.62% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
76.88%
FCF growth of 76.88% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-31.22%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-55.30%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 6.49%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-46.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 16.98%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-101.54%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-101.62%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 14.95%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-100.43%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 2.34%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
253.98%
Net income/share CAGR of 253.98% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-96.52%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 43.09%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
101.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 5.47%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-99.54%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-99.43%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-99.08%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.30%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-57.94%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
14.94%
Asset growth of 14.94% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
112.55%
BV/share growth of 112.55% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1.93%
Debt growth of 1.93% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
13.42%
R&D growth of 13.42% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
9.49%
SG&A growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.