PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.60%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -2.14%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-60.64%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 2.33%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
1.26%
EBIT growth below 50% of Solar median of 33.30%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental operating challenges.
-2402.01%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 14.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-126.30%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 25.41%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-121.25%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 0.46%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-127.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 0.46%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
10.75%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
13.64%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7700.65%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is -40.23%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-934.80%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is -9.49%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-27.10%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is -9.17%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-20.32%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -8.76%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
12.30%
3Y CAGR of 12.30% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-635.26%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-23.78%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-16.38%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-106.42%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 30.71%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
88.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Solar median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
99.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 63.80%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-99.63%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-99.51%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is -1.99%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-99.06%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.60%
Slight AR growth while Solar cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
139.77%
Inventory growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-8.03%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-15.74%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.27%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-14.37%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.94%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.