PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-21.43%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -1.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-42.33%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
111.92%
EBIT growth of 111.92% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
64.58%
Operating income growth of 64.58% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
1454.16%
Net income growth of 1454.16% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
1511.76%
EPS growth of 1511.76% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1581.48%
Diluted EPS growth of 1581.48% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.70%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
8.33%
Diluted share change of 8.33% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.51%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
107.53%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 14.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-48.37%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-26.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -4.36%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-11.74%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
117.10%
OCF/share CAGR of 117.10% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
107.70%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 51.76%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
110.47%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Solar median of 3.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
275.24%
Net income/share CAGR of 275.24% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
135.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 37.28%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
116.95%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-98.79%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-98.37%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-96.52%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.94%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-8.01%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-2.95%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
104.47%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-0.32%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-21.12%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-15.15%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.