PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-22.13%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is 16.92%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
71.96%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 10.05%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
139.53%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 9.06%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
71.69%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 20.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
130.29%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 20.08%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
116.67%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 19.62%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 20.12%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.06%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 1.29%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
3.38%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-311.47%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-447.93%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-71.88%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is -13.32%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-42.02%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -24.72%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-53.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -1.02%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
14.81%
OCF/share CAGR of 14.81% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
66.29%
5Y OCF/share growth 75-90% of Solar median. John Neff would encourage margin or efficiency gains to catch up.
-34.59%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
24.98%
Positive 10Y net income/share CAGR while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch sees a resilient enterprise vs. struggling peers.
163.56%
Net income/share CAGR of 163.56% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
167.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 167.47% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-100.41%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-100.54%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-101.20%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.54%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-50.57%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-25.24%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-117.10%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 4.60%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-7.17%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-56.68%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-36.64%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.