PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.38%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 6.69%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
102.35%
Gross profit growth of 102.35% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
186.59%
Positive EBIT growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
1259.49%
Positive operating income growth while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
824.29%
Positive net income growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
830.77%
Positive EPS growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
766.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.09%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.81%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.63%
OCF growth of 134.63% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
125.80%
FCF growth of 125.80% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-79.51%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is -0.05%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-27.17%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-57.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 6.29%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-96.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
104.06%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 21.99%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-74.13%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 23.86%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
52.21%
Positive 10Y net income/share CAGR while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch sees a resilient enterprise vs. struggling peers.
357.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
159.44%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-86.30%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-77.75%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
131.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 14.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-12.53%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
18.21%
Inventory growth of 18.21% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
13.60%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.63%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
5847.50%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-26.60%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-38.72%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
48.07%
SG&A growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.