PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.36%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is 4.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-33.63%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 15.58%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-110.42%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 30.38%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-105.75%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 29.28%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-111.73%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 46.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-111.98%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 59.21%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-113.46%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 56.73%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.55%
Share reduction exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt would applaud significant buybacks if they are value-accretive.
-14.46%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 4.67%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-367.05%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is -11.54%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-441.53%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-61.76%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-36.20%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-35.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 4.61%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
86.97%
OCF/share CAGR of 86.97% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
91.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 91.25% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
85.82%
3Y OCF/share growth of 85.82% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-1185.23%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 78.80%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
54.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 12.83%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
65.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 4.66%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-87.55%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-78.76%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-38.27%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 8.78%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.32%
AR growth of 7.32% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
9.55%
Inventory growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-3.14%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-11.71%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
4.40%
Debt growth of 4.40% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
53.13%
R&D growth of 53.13% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-9.08%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.