PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.27%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 15.92%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
12.71%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 6.67%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-233.84%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 3.30%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-90.19%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is 6.78%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-91.84%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-89.47%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-89.47%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.33%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.33%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.66%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 41.24%. Mohnish Pabrai would verify if these gains stem from sustainable core operations.
41.15%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 24.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-52.25%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
2.11%
5Y CAGR of 2.11% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-21.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 1.31%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
14.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 14.74% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
72.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 72.34% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
43.59%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Solar median of 17.25%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
48.93%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 4.98% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
46.04%
Net income/share CAGR of 46.04% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-142.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.82%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-75.77%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-55.61%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
313.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 12.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
AR growth of 15.84% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-9.40%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-2.18%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
16.14%
BV/share growth of 16.14% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1.70%
Debt growth of 1.70% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
47.80%
R&D growth of 47.80% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
20.84%
SG&A growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.