PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.87%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 1.60%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
29.38%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 21.55%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if economies of scale justify the premium growth.
510.02%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 18.04%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
150.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 18.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
314.88%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 19.42%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
316.67%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 30.50%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
300.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 30.50%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.10%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
10.66%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.53%
OCF growth of 90.53% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
68.62%
FCF growth of 68.62% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-49.92%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-21.54%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-18.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
88.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 88.61% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
84.07%
Positive 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch would note a competitive advantage in mid-term cash generation.
88.00%
3Y OCF/share growth of 88.00% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
290.88%
Net income/share CAGR of 290.88% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
300.31%
Net income/share CAGR of 300.31% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
839.36%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 839.36% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-65.99%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-36.42%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
373.90%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 373.90% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.10%
AR growth of 18.10% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
2.57%
Inventory growth far above Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
11.78%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
35.07%
Positive BV/share change while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-5.16%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-8.39%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.36%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.