PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.54%
Revenue growth below 50% of Solar median of 17.45%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
-0.76%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 1.11%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-91.91%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
76.66%
Positive operating income growth while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
-94.39%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-94.87%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-94.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.06%
Share change of 0.06% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-8.82%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-119.63%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 3.88%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-13.53%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-50.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 27.40%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-39.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 32.75%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-27.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 20.24%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-105.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-119.42%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-341.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
103.58%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 48.61% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
101.07%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 14.93%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
22.42%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-60.55%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
222.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 11.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
4848.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 13.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.03%
AR growth of 5.03% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
38.80%
Inventory growth of 38.80% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
3.64%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
1.53%
BV/share growth of 1.53% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1.70%
Debt growth of 1.70% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-18.04%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-5.70%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.