PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.10%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Solar median of 8.31%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
15.31%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 5.76%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
44.28%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 4.30%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
23.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 1.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
42.88%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.42%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
34.48%
EPS growth of 34.48% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
34.48%
Diluted EPS growth of 34.48% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.29%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.29%
Diluted share change of 0.29% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.22%
OCF growth of 87.22% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
77.66%
FCF growth of 77.66% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-44.47%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 10.61%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-16.93%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 31.27%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
27.52%
3Y revenue/share growth near Solar median of 25.13%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
81.97%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 17.32% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
88.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 88.61% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-181.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-210.21%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 97.06%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
94.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 40.33%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-256.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 10.25%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-65.63%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
1001.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 1001.41% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
1362.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 14.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.28%
Receivables shrinking more than Solar median. Joel Greenblatt might see strong working capital management or a shift to cash sales.
11.05%
Inventory growth of 11.05% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
5.45%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 2.22%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-5.37%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is 0.32%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
22.31%
Debt growth of 22.31% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-10.20%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-8.99%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.