PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.05%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -4.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-91.56%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is 1.41%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-117.68%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 0.79%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
52.17%
Positive operating income growth while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
-19.73%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -27.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
5.26%
Positive EPS growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
-2636.84%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is -9.68%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.11%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.11%
Diluted share change of 0.11% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.64%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
37.43%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 3.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-54.63%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-19.07%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
52.14%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 28.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-148.30%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
89.98%
OCF/share CAGR of 89.98% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
55.23%
3Y OCF/share growth of 55.23% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-123.86%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 17.22%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
66.53%
Net income/share CAGR of 66.53% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-181.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 9.62%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-72.89%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
707.78%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 707.78% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
4083.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Solar median of 7.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.69%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-23.48%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-8.03%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-11.43%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is -0.47%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-9.91%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-16.93%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-79.07%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.