PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-97.19%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -31.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-15.10%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is -15.10%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
65.81%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 5.90%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
53.01%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 5.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
65.32%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 22.12%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
71.83%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 21.84%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
71.83%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 21.84%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-71.98%
Share reduction while Solar median is 0.06%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-72.01%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.13%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.45%
Positive OCF growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
85.98%
Positive FCF growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
-96.39%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-91.67%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-88.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-124.40%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is -3.14%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
90.42%
Positive 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch would note a competitive advantage in mid-term cash generation.
57.28%
3Y OCF/share growth of 57.28% while Solar median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-136.70%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
69.14%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
30.87%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-118.50%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.72%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
14.22%
Below 50% of Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
-182.52%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 20.28%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.27%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-98.94%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-96.97%
Assets shrink while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-199.02%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is -1.04%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-81.21%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-47.57%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.