PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.24%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-253.92%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is -3.55%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-554.55%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is -26.62%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-215.67%
Negative operating income growth while Solar median is -26.62%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-390.49%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -97.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-296.15%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is -96.99%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-296.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is -96.99%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-38.35%
Share reduction while Solar median is 0.06%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-38.35%
Diluted share reduction while Solar median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-697.99%
Negative OCF growth while Solar median is -8.81%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-612.15%
Negative FCF growth while Solar median is 15.43%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-98.55%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.94%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-97.80%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 0.94%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-96.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is 7.86%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-15.34%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is -3.27%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-12.63%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-107.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-523.77%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Solar median of -48.51%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-882.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is -69.11%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-111.99%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -21.80%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-117.92%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-61.98%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 17.16%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-189.42%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 1.29%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.77%
AR shrinking while Solar median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-70.14%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
223.24%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-151.68%
Negative BV/share change while Solar median is -3.40%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
191.33%
Debt growth far outpacing Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects over-leveraging or deteriorating financial discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
211.71%
Our SG&A slightly up while Solar is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.