PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.69%
Negative revenue growth while Solar median is -6.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.73%
Negative gross profit growth while Solar median is -15.16%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-71.58%
Negative EBIT growth while Solar median is 61.03%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
104.85%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
-82.70%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -15.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-83.87%
Negative EPS growth while Solar median is -46.59%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-99.76%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Solar median is -44.59%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
6.32%
Share growth above Solar median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
115.49%
Diluted share growth above 2x Solar median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.72%
OCF growth of 89.72% while Solar is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
89.76%
Positive FCF growth while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
-69.07%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Solar median is 36.96%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-61.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Solar median is 13.82%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-48.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Solar median is -20.55%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
96.18%
OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Solar median of 70.23%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if disciplined capex and stable margins contribute to this advantage.
96.92%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 15.63%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
94.77%
3Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Solar median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm if cost advantage or brand strength explains near-term outperformance.
239.80%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 63.49% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
1296.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
153.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-109.80%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 100.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-2088.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Solar median is 57.85%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-153.70%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Solar median is -56.81%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.40%
Receivables growth far exceeding Solar median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
-50.20%
Decreasing inventory while Solar is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.32%
We expand assets while Solar is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
14.20%
Positive BV/share change while Solar median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-7.07%
Debt is shrinking while Solar median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.71%
SG&A decline while Solar grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.