PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.39%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -1.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-28.35%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-194.50%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.68%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-360.84%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-375.90%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-380.00%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-18766.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.90%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-50.22%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.06%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.37%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-68.37%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-70.54%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-59.76%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-65.22%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
96.53%
OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median of 83.24%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if disciplined capex and stable margins contribute to this advantage.
-145.05%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 59.79%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
82.95%
3Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm if cost advantage or brand strength explains near-term outperformance.
-672.69%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 82.76%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-343.37%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 67.49%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
23.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Energy median. Guy Spier might worry about a partial underperformance vs. competitor norms.
-111.62%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is -30.50%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-812.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-155.81%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 6.96%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.46%
Slight AR growth while Energy cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
-52.87%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
10.37%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.81%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-19.39%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
11.00%
Debt growth of 11.00% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.49%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.