1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.02%
Revenue growth of 14.02% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
19.50%
Gross profit growth of 19.50% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
47.10%
EBIT growth of 47.10% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
47.10%
Operating income growth of 47.10% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
18.20%
Net income growth of 18.20% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
14.29%
EPS growth of 14.29% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
23.08%
Diluted EPS growth of 23.08% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-4.47%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-6.70%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-740.28%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-250.83%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1309.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 15.80%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
1309.36%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 11.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
1309.36%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.93%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-2660.50%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-2660.50%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-2660.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
220.80%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.98% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
220.80%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 27.98%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
220.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 13.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.44%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-12.62%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.21%
Asset growth of 2.21% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
7.35%
BV/share growth of 7.35% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.10%
R&D growth of 1.10% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-1.63%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.