PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
22.07%
Revenue growth of 22.07% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-8.12%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-285.53%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-437.48%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-531.05%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-455.50%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-455.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.89%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-5.06%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.45%
OCF growth of 152.45% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
35.56%
FCF growth of 35.56% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
148.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 12.68%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
148.43%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 29.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
148.43%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-93.69%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-93.69%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-93.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
80.22%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 12.09% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
80.22%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 16.83%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
80.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Energy median of 7.75%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.25%
AR growth of 21.25% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
37.61%
Inventory growth of 37.61% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
3.15%
Asset growth of 3.15% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.15%
BV/share growth of 0.15% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.92%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
16.71%
SG&A growth of 16.71% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.