PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.22%
Revenue growth of 6.22% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
401.45%
Gross profit growth of 401.45% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
9.96%
EBIT growth of 9.96% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
3.07%
Positive operating income growth while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
19.72%
Positive net income growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
-40.00%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is -19.44%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-37.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is -20.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.07%
Share change of 0.07% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.05%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.96%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-175.51%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
6103.75%
10Y CAGR of 6103.75% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
6103.75%
5Y CAGR of 6103.75% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
295.54%
3Y CAGR of 295.54% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
2525.30%
OCF/share CAGR of 2525.30% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
2525.30%
OCF/share CAGR of 2525.30% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
15668.27%
3Y OCF/share growth of 15668.27% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
358.17%
Net income/share CAGR of 358.17% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
358.17%
Net income/share CAGR of 358.17% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
1436.34%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 1436.34% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Energy median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.87%
AR growth of 14.87% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
31.97%
Inventory growth of 31.97% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
7.73%
Asset growth of 7.73% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.37%
BV/share growth of 2.37% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
12.52%
Debt growth of 12.52% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-126.33%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.18%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.