PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.20%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.45%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-78.20%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-1010.38%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-7584.19%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-6871.81%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-6763.64%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-6763.64%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.25%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
1.25%
Diluted share growth above 2x Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.38%
OCF growth of 39.38% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
41.08%
FCF growth of 41.08% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
551.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 3.99%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
610.09%
5Y CAGR of 610.09% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
25.83%
3Y CAGR of 25.83% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-200.41%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-1610.30%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-387.08%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-320.95%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of 6.12%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-1901.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-485.94%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
110.96%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 110.96% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
25.32%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 25.32% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.28%
AR growth of 58.28% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-15.35%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.92%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-9.42%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-4.16%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
11.79%
R&D growth of 11.79% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
33.38%
SG&A growth of 33.38% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.