PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.11%
Revenue growth of 19.11% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
294.55%
Gross profit growth of 294.55% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-215.39%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-262.81%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-150.75%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-149.67%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-149.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.62%
Share change of 0.62% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.62%
Diluted share change of 0.62% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.36%
OCF growth of 120.36% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
103.24%
FCF growth of 103.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
657.47%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 7.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
53.03%
3Y CAGR of 53.03% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.48%
OCF/share CAGR of 127.48% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-88.02%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2819.21%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-1330.25%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.75%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 72.75% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-3.62%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.64%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
3.06%
Inventory growth of 3.06% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-5.28%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-21.84%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
18.12%
Debt growth of 18.12% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-16.98%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-15.99%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.