1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.29%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
2.22%
Gross profit growth of 2.22% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
12.60%
EBIT growth of 12.60% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
9.04%
Operating income growth of 9.04% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
10.29%
Net income growth of 10.29% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
20.24%
EPS growth of 20.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
20.24%
Diluted EPS growth of 20.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
14.39%
Share change of 14.39% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
14.39%
Diluted share change of 14.39% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-202.05%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-292.59%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
39.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR near Energy median of 42.05%. Charlie Munger might expect stable industry trends guiding long-term growth.
128.96%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 12.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
73.16%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 19.54%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
75.96%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.94% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
-822.78%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-92.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
67.76%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Energy median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
-4064.44%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 2.86%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-466.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 21.28%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.34%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 29.34% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-16.57%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.84%
AR growth of 59.84% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
15.80%
Inventory growth of 15.80% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.87%
Assets shrink while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.65%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-28.87%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
39.51%
R&D growth of 39.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.21%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.