1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.90%
Revenue growth of 8.90% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
9.90%
Gross profit growth of 9.90% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
58.94%
EBIT growth of 58.94% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
-46.05%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
42.34%
Net income growth of 42.34% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
42.25%
EPS growth of 42.25% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
42.25%
Diluted EPS growth of 42.25% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.39%
Share change of 0.39% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.86%
OCF growth of 28.86% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
35.38%
FCF growth of 35.38% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.88%
5Y CAGR of 80.88% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
10.76%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Energy median of 13.66%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.95%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-132.01%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-476.02%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-298.04%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 15.41%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.06%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-34.13%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.90%
AR growth of 61.90% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-9.50%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.24%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos suspects stagnation or limited capital availability for expansions.
-3.97%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.90%
Debt is shrinking while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
6.04%
R&D growth of 6.04% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
11.58%
SG&A growth of 11.58% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.