PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.49%
Revenue growth of 30.49% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
15.26%
Gross profit growth of 15.26% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
231.50%
EBIT growth of 231.50% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
233.84%
Operating income growth of 233.84% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
127.15%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.24%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
118.18%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.57%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
122.22%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.59%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
1.12%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
6.90%
Diluted share growth above 2x Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.45%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 4.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
52.35%
FCF growth of 52.35% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.55%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-29.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 27.43%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-212.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 5.90%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.49%
Below 50% of Energy median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
106.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 106.47% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-11.49%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 4.06%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.73%
AR growth of 14.73% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-14.97%
Decreasing inventory while Energy is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.00%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.04%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
2.08%
BV/share growth of 2.08% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
0.25%
Debt growth of 0.25% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
4.28%
R&D growth of 4.28% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-4.34%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.