PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.21%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is -3.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-11.62%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is -1.17%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-170.82%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is -5.42%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-34.04%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is -2.89%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-965.36%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is -6.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-920.00%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-1125.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.56%
Share growth above Energy median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-13.07%
Diluted share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.99%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
33.16%
FCF growth of 33.16% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
253.43%
10Y CAGR of 253.43% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-51.51%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-48.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -16.64%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-227.20%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-152.69%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-185.48%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-603.56%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -55.77%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-296.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -42.19%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-1.15%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -53.99%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
254.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 254.46% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-24.80%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
19.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 19.02% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.50%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
12.62%
Inventory growth of 12.62% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.05%
We expand assets while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
-2.39%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is -1.76%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
4.50%
Debt growth of 4.50% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
21.46%
R&D growth of 21.46% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.50%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.