PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.54%
Negative revenue growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-67.59%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-154.70%
Negative EBIT growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-167.27%
Negative operating income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-126.58%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-129.27%
Negative EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-126.83%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.48%
Share reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.13%
Diluted share change of 0.13% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-185.68%
Negative OCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-120.29%
Negative FCF growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
118.93%
10Y CAGR of 118.93% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-71.86%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-51.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -15.96%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-59829.12%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-185.54%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-283.83%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-3321.62%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -21.52%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-159.04%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -33.84%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
22.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-3.86%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-38.42%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
27.56%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 27.56% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.29%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
9.37%
Inventory growth of 9.37% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
10.53%
Asset growth of 10.53% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-5.07%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
55.83%
Debt growth of 55.83% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
29.59%
R&D growth of 29.59% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
30.25%
SG&A growth of 30.25% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.