PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.24%
Revenue growth of 9.24% vs. zero growth in Energy. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-19.88%
Negative gross profit growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
5.51%
EBIT growth of 5.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
5.24%
Operating income growth of 5.24% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
18.05%
Net income growth of 18.05% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
17.74%
EPS growth of 17.74% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
17.74%
Diluted EPS growth of 17.74% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.64%
Share change of 0.64% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.64%
Diluted share change of 0.64% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.87%
OCF growth of 18.87% while Energy is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
15.59%
FCF growth of 15.59% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
256.51%
10Y CAGR of 256.51% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-49.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Energy median is -18.73%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-36.12%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -34.78%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-3127.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-100.46%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-297.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Energy median is -0.35%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-702.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Energy median of -46.94%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
66.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
-413.33%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Energy median is -33.84%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
30.14%
Equity/share CAGR of 30.14% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-38.31%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
18.92%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Energy is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.03%
AR shrinking while Energy median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
20.97%
Inventory growth of 20.97% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
7.58%
Asset growth of 7.58% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-3.73%
Negative BV/share change while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
21.02%
Debt growth of 21.02% while Energy median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-3.96%
R&D dropping while Energy median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-13.40%
SG&A decline while Energy grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.